Sanaia received a face injury back then however, he never claimed that the government would stage his sudden death. Sanaia and his family were indeed attacked on February 25th by several people, where they were physically and verbally assaulted. Nonetheless, he has never mentioned anything about him being attacked. Vakho Sanaia was actively making statements regarding the death of Lashkarava and the inaction of the Georgian government both on his Facebook page and live during the protest held on July 11th. The Fabricated quote of Vakho Sanaia appeared on social media only after the announcement of the death of Aleksandre Lashkarava – a TV cameraman heavily beaten by the violent groups on July 5th. No open source indicates that either Mamulashvili and Sanaia or Pataraia made such comments. In reality, the journalist and the rights-defendant have never made statements of similar content. The quotes shared by Liberaluri seni and Kogarashi Urie are fabricated. According to the demand, especially films involving Sylvester Stallone and Arnold Schwarzenegger have to be banned. On July 14th, a Facebook user named “Kogarashi Urie” published the demand of Baia Pataraia, where the activist requests banning films shaping potential oppressors. Two days later, on July 12th, the same page shared another quote of Vakho Sanaia, as if the journalist claimed that he was attacked, kicked, and if he dies unexpectedly, this would be staged by the government. On July 10th, the Facebook page “Liberastuli seni” published a quote, which was ascribed to Maia Mamulashvili, and claimed that homophobes sent by ‘Putinist groups’ had bitten children. “The erroneous results represented some of the larger correlations between personality and politics ever reported they were reported and interpreted, repeatedly, in the wrong direction,” he said.Georgian social network accommodates a number of quotes shared in the name of journalists and civil activists. The journal said the error doesn’t change the main conclusions of the paper, which found that “personality traits do not cause people to develop political attitudes.”īut professor Steven Ludeke of the University of Southern Denmark, who pointed out the errors, told Retraction Watch that they “matter quite a lot.” “It’s our fault for not figuring it out before.” All I know is it happened,” he told Retraction Watch, a blog that tracks corrections in academic papers. The erroneous report has been cited 45 times, according to Thomson Reuters Web of Science.īrad Verhulst, a Virginia Commonwealth University researcher and a co-author of the paper, said he was not sure who was to blame. The social-desirability scale measures people’s tendency to answer questions in ways they believe would please researchers, even if it means overestimating their positive characteristics and underestimating negative ones. In the paper, psychoticism is associated with traits such as tough-mindedness, risk-taking, sensation-seeking, impulsivity and authoritarianism. “The descriptive analyses report that those higher in Eysenck’s psychoticism are more conservative, but they are actually more liberal and where the original manuscript reports those higher in neuroticism and social desirability are more liberal, they are, in fact, more conservative.” “The interpretation of the coding of the political attitude items in the descriptive and preliminary analyses portion of the manuscript was exactly reversed,” the journal said in the startling correction. The American Journal of Political Science published a correction this year saying that the 2012 paper has “an error” - and that liberal political beliefs, not conservative ones, are actually linked to psychoticism. Turns out liberals are the real authoritarians.Ī political-science journal that published an oft-cited study claiming conservatives were more likely to show traits associated with “psychoticism” now says it got it wrong. Joe Biden can’t even fill in FCC post with leftist nomination Liberals are more likely to be maladjusted wet blankets: Here's the proof Joe Rogan denies he's a conservative, slams GOP: 'I was on welfare as a kid'Ī liberal TikToker’s viral epic rant against tone-deaf Democrats and why they'll lose in November
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |